The demo
There is no live demo yet.
We could stage one. A recorded walkthrough over a corpus we chose, with questions we picked, would take an afternoon and would look convincing. It would also be the exact thing this product exists to argue against, so we would rather show you nothing than show you that.
The honest position, in one line: the specifications are finished and the first feature — she answers a real question about a real document — is being built now. The demo arrives when that feature is genuinely working end to end, and not before.
What it will show
Written down now, in public, so that when it does appear you can hold it against this list rather than against whatever we felt like demonstrating on the day.
A real document going in, one fact at a time
You upload something ordinary — a policy, a report, a contract — and watch the model propose single facts from it, each one anchored to the exact span it came from, with the ones that do not anchor visibly rejected. The point of the demo is that you can see what the model was and was not allowed to author.
A question answered, and the answer taken apart
Ask something the document actually answers. Then open the answer up: every claim in it should dereference to a source you can click through to. A claim that cannot is the failure case, and the demo will show that case rather than hide it.
A question it should refuse
Ask something the corpus cannot support. The honest gap is the feature — she should say what she does not know, name what she had not finished reading, and record the question rather than produce a confident sentence with nothing under it.
The record, open to inspection
Every ingest, question, retrieval and answer written to a signed chain you can browse without a key, and the adjudicator’s verdicts sitting on their own audit chain beside them. Change one block and the chain says so.
There was a working demo once
The previous build of Mnemosyne ran a live demo on a synthetic pharmaceutical company, with real documents, real compartment walls and a chain anchored into Bitcoin. It was genuine. We archived it anyway, because underneath all of that it could not reliably answer a basic question about a real document — it was finding its own best evidence and discarding it. That machine has been decommissioned and this rebuild puts the answering first. The full reasoning is on the documentation page, where every capability carries its true status.